Salaita Speaks Out: A Report-Back from the Press Conference

Salaita Speaks Out: A Report-Back from the Press Conference

Salaita Speaks Out: A Report-Back from the Press Conference

By : Samantha Brotman

At a press conference this afternoon, Professor Steven Salaita spoke publicly for the first time since the termination of his employment. Nearly one year ago, Professor Steven Salaita accepted an offer from the interim Dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences to join the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign as a professor with lifetime tenure. However, a number of wealthy donors pressured the UIUC Board of Trustees and chancellor to rescind Professor Salaita’s offer of employment, citing the professor’s controversial tweets about the most recent Israeli attack on Gaza. In early August of 2014, two weeks before Professor Salaita was scheduled to begin teaching courses, UIUC Chancellor Phyllis Wise sent Professor Salaita a letter informing him that his offer of employment had been terminated. A large public outcry ensued, with over 5000 scholars boycotting the University of Illinois until Professor Salaita is reinstated.

Today’s press conference drew a sizeable crowd, with hundreds of people spilling out from the event hall and into the lobby. Speakers included a representative from the Graduate Employees’ Organization, student organizers, American Indian Studies’ director Robert Warrior, head of the English department Michael Rothberg, Professor Salaita’s legal representative, Maria LaHood from the Center for Constitutional Rights and Professor Steven Salaita himself.

LaHood headed off the press conference by emphasizing that Dr. Salaita’s case raised profoundly important questions about academic freedom and the first amendment. She lauded the academic boycott and the now eleven UIUC departments that have voted “no confidence” in Chancellor Wise. According to LaHood, what is happening to Professor Salaita is but one example of a common tactic used to silence critiques of Israel: to brand support for Palestinian rights and personhood as uncivil. “What is actually uncivil,” LaHood insisted, “is the killing of more than 500 children, and the terminating of a tenured professor because he dared to speak out.” LaHood, along with all other speakers at today’s press conference, called upon the Board of Trustees and Chancellor Wise to uphold the principles of academic freedom and to reinstate Professor Salaita.

Dr. Salaita’s focused and powerful address emphasized one clear message: the reaffirmation of his “commitment to teaching and to a position with the American Indian Studies program at UIUC.” Salaita and his lawyers repeatedly insisted that their goal was not to pursue legal recourse against the university, but for the Chancellor and the Board of Trustees to reinstate his position. However, it was clear that he and his legal team are prepared to pursue legal avenues to force his reinstatement if necessary.

Dr. Salaita explained the profound impact the university’s decision had on his personal and professional life. His family, he explained, now has no income or health insurance and great damage has been done to his reputation. Beyond the personal cost he has paid, Dr. Salaita deplored what he sees as the risk of creating a  “Palestinian exception” to the first amendment and academic freedom. Salaita stressed the quality of his teaching record, insisting that he has always been a collegial and dedicated educator, and that he remains more dedicated than ever to challenging prevailing orthodoxies. “This is, as we say in my profession, a teaching moment,” Salaita said.

Asked by a member of the press whether he supported the over 5000 scholars who have pledged to boycott the university until his reinstatement, Dr. Salaita paused. After a few moments of careful thought, Salaita responded with a confident, “I do.” Boycott, he explained, is another form of speech and political expression and is within our right as Americans and as students and faculty.

\"\"
[The view from the back of the press conference room. Image by author.]

Dr. Salaita’s appearance was met with a great deal of enthusiasm. Chanting, cheering and applause frequently interrupted his address and those of the other speakers. One member of the press asked Salaita why he would want to return to the UIUC despite all of the controversy and hardship. Salaita replied, “The answer is in this room.” Calling today’s press conference “one of the proudest moments of [his] life,” Salaita extended his thanks to all of his supporters at UIUC and beyond.

Dr. Salaita, his legal team, and the student and faculty organizers remain committed Professor Salaita’s reinstatement. All are hopeful that Thursday’s meeting of the Board of Trustees will bring good news. 

\"\"

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412